Late March was our 50th reunion for college. One of the old friends I met there was chatting about her vitamin D experience: she had discovered she was deficient, and had needed a booster course to bring her back up to normal levels. She mentioned some of the symptoms: fatigue, bone pain, muscle weakness,...
I recognised some of those symptoms, although I hadn't realised the pain near the top of my pelvis I was having might be bone pain: I didn't know bones could hurt! Muscles yes. Joints yes. But bones themselves?
So I booked a blood test, and I had a blood sample taken on Tuesday morning. They said I should get my results in a week. But Wednesday (yesterday) morning my doctor phoned: I was vitamin D deficient, and she was prescribing me a "loading dose" to bring me up to a better level.
I went online to look at the actual test results. I was at less than 25 ("deficient"), where 25-50 is "inadequate", 50-70 is "adequate", and (presumably not too much) over 70 is "optimal" (units are nmol/l). So yes, clearly a problem.
This morning I picked up my prescription: 6 capsules, each with a dose of 50,000 IU ("international units"), to be taken once a week.
Since the typical maintenance dose is 400 IU a day during winter, that loading dose is nearly 20x the maintenance level! Wow! Let's see how it goes.
I'm not sure when in the day I should take it. The NHS site says "with your main meal of the day", which for me would be evening dinner. Other places say to take it early in the day. Also, to take it with fat to maximise absorption (despite being recommended a low fat diet). Hey ho. I'll take it at lunchtime then, with an oily fish dish.
Anyway, from blood sample to prescription in hand, less than 48 hours. NHS FTW!














