I've blogged before about offers journal editors get to be unethical.
The offers continue:
Dear [editor in chief],
I hope you are doing well. My name is Ivy Yang, and I work as a publishing development editor focusing on academic journal collaborations and manuscript resources.
I am reaching out to explore the possibility of private cooperation with you regarding submissions to your journal. We have a stable number of manuscripts in related research areas and are looking for an experienced editor who can help oversee the handling process in an efficient and professional manner.
Our expectation is that submitted papers can receive timely attention, be assigned to suitable reviewers, and move through peer review smoothly. Where appropriate and in line with journal policy, we may also recommend qualified reviewer candidates for your consideration, which could help save time in the reviewer selection process.
For successfully accepted manuscripts, we would also be happy to offer a cooperation fee or honorarium. The specific arrangement can be discussed privately based on mutual understanding.
We highly value long-term cooperation based on mutual trust, efficiency, and professional communication. If this possibility is of interest to you, I would be glad to discuss details with you privately at your convenience.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Ivy Yang
I've bolded the most dubious part: a “cooperation fee” “discussed privately”. Okaaaaay, that sounds legit.
<\s>
Well, Ivy is nothing if not persistent. And the next email was much more explicit. Actual dollar amounts.
Our work focuses on helping authors identify suitable journals and supporting them throughout the submission and peer-review process. This is a paid collaboration, and the compensation is provided on a per-paper basis, depending on the journal category:
EI-indexed journals: USD 200–1000 per paper;
SCI-indexed journals: USD 500–2200 per paper;
SSCI-indexed journals: USD 1000–3000 per paper.
The exact amount depends on the journal level, workload, and degree of involvement.
If you are interested in this opportunity, I would be happy to discuss further details with you. We can continue via email or any platform convenient for you.
Ivy Yang
Up to 3000 USD under-the-table remuneration per paper! Pay-to-publish takes on a whole different meaning. No wonder there are so many junk journals. (Although, like any such scam, I would bet the numbers change once an "agreement" is in place.)
Remember, gentle reader, just because a paper is “in the literature” and has been “peer reviewed” doesn't mean it is of any value whatsoever (scientifically that is; clearly there is a monetary value!) Junk journals, paper mills, AI slop. The literature is not merely being polluted, it is being swamped with drek. Is this how progress ends? Sinking into the shoulders of Swamp Thing?
No comments:
Post a Comment