Someone with the same approach to cooking as me.
But not the same approach to science fiction...
For all my social networking posts, see
my Google+ page
Thursday, 29 September 2016
Sunday, 25 September 2016
why why why
Feynman gives a marvelous “answer” to “why do magnets repel?”
[via Sabine Hossenfelder's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
[via Sabine Hossenfelder's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Saturday, 24 September 2016
noise mining
Labels:
research,
science,
statistics
Damning indictment of statistically sloppy research:
[via Danny Yee's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
What has happened down here is the winds have changed
the authors’ claim that fixing the errors “does not change the conclusion of the paper” is both ridiculous and all too true
[via Danny Yee's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Wednesday, 21 September 2016
green
Labels:
Amsterdam,
China,
complexity,
conference,
food,
Netherlands
Day two in Amsterdam.
I thought this was a lot of bikes:
until I saw this:
My second day at CCS, and today I had lots of choice of what to go to, as there were 16 parallel sessions. To expand my range, I chose the morning workshop on Fractional Calculus, followed by the afternoon workshop on Complexity for History and History for Complexity. Then it was the conference dinner: a magnificent Chinese meal on a multi-storey boat.
I thought this was a lot of bikes:
suddenly bikes! 1000s of them! |
until I saw this:
multi-storey bike park |
My second day at CCS, and today I had lots of choice of what to go to, as there were 16 parallel sessions. To expand my range, I chose the morning workshop on Fractional Calculus, followed by the afternoon workshop on Complexity for History and History for Complexity. Then it was the conference dinner: a magnificent Chinese meal on a multi-storey boat.
Tuesday, 20 September 2016
if this is Tuesday, it must be Amsterdam
Labels:
Amsterdam,
complexity,
conference,
evolution,
Netherlands,
trains
So I’m now in Amsterdam, for the Conference on Complex Systems.
The view from my hotel window this morning shows how convenient it is for the station:
Today was our second EvoEvo project workshop, with lots of interesting talks about the evolution of evolution, mostly in in silico models.
The view from my hotel window this morning shows how convenient it is for the station:
maybe a little too convenient for the station? |
Today was our second EvoEvo project workshop, with lots of interesting talks about the evolution of evolution, mostly in in silico models.
Monday, 19 September 2016
ambrosia in a small black bag
My flight from Edinburgh was delayed for an hour this evening, so I had a chance to investigate all the food outlets for something for dinner. In WHSmith, I came across "bananas in raw chocolate". It sounded intriguing, so I thought I'd give it a try.
Oh yes. 70g of heaven.
Oh yes. 70g of heaven.
view from a conference centre window
Labels:
conference,
Edinburgh
I'm in Edinburgh, at the PPSN (Parallel Processing Solutions from Nature) conference. I have learned about a new surrogate model optimisation technique: Kriging.
My room doesn’t really have a view from the (very high) window, so the standard photo doesn’t make sense. Instead, here is a view from the conference centre itself, of a magnificent Scottish mansion: St Leonard’s Hall.
My room doesn’t really have a view from the (very high) window, so the standard photo doesn’t make sense. Instead, here is a view from the conference centre itself, of a magnificent Scottish mansion: St Leonard’s Hall.
Saturday, 17 September 2016
book review: Constellation Games
Labels:
books,
computer,
game,
Mars,
moon,
review,
science fiction,
space flight
Leonard Richardson.
Constellation Games.
Candlemark and Gleam. 2011
The back-cover blurb:
The aliens are about as useless as the humans, too. They are in several minds (some more so than others) about what to do about earth: they were expecting to find the usual post-self-annihilation scenario, and are a bit bemused about the pre/ongoing-self-annihilation scenario they encounter instead.
Personally, I prefer “competence porn” style tales, rather than “loveable (allegedly) man-child and evil hapless bureaucrats bumble through world-changing events”. I never find the latter as funny as I am supposed to. There’s quite enough incompetence in real life thank-you-very-much; I read for escapism. However, things do pick up as Ariel begins to realise the seriousness of the situation and starts doing stuff. Although how effectively remains a question.
Despite their uselessness, I did nevertheless like the aliens. They are alien in many ways, both physically and psychologically; in fact, some of the physical descriptions had me flashing back to Sector General tales. Their “Constellation” idea for group working is intriguing; the eventual explanation of its genesis adding an unexpected layer. I also liked the fact that Ariel is effortlessly at ease with these aliens, unlike many of his earth-side relationships.
But all in all, I felt there was more interesting stuff going on behind the scenes than in main view. What was up with the Martian sub-plot? What were all the other aliens doing (we only see a handful)? What does the rest of the galaxy look like (these aliens are atypical)? Just what was the code Ariel wrote to reconfigure the habitat? Is the posed solution to uploading workable? And so on.
For the record, this is my one thousandth blog post!
Constellation Games.
Candlemark and Gleam. 2011
The back-cover blurb:
First contact isn’t all fun and games.
Ariel Blum is pushing thirty and doesn’t have much to show for it. His computer programming skills are producing nothing but pony-themed video games for little girls. His love life is a slow-motion train wreck, and whenever he tries to make something of his life, he finds himself back an the couch, replaying the games of his youth.
Out of the sky comes the Constellation: a swarm of anarchist anthropologists, exploring our seas, cataloguing our plants, editing our wikis and eating our Twinkies. No one knows how to respond – except far nerds like Ariel who’ve been reading, role-playing and wargaming first-contact scenarios their entire lives. Ariel sees the aliens’ computers, and knows that wherever there are computers, there are video games. Ariel just wants to start a business translating alien games so they can be played on human computers. But a simple cultural exchange turns up ancient secrets, government conspiracies, and unconventional anthropology techniques that threaten humanity as we know it. If Ariel wants his species to have a future, he’s going to have to take the step that nothing on Earth could make him take: he’ll have to grow up.That back-cover blurb gives a fair overview of the content. What sets this apart from others in the “worst choice of human for alien first contact” sub-genre is the style: a combination of blog posts and alien game reviews. Discovering millennia of alien history through playing their video games provides interesting insights, but trying to do it essentially all this way is maybe a step too far.
The aliens are about as useless as the humans, too. They are in several minds (some more so than others) about what to do about earth: they were expecting to find the usual post-self-annihilation scenario, and are a bit bemused about the pre/ongoing-self-annihilation scenario they encounter instead.
Personally, I prefer “competence porn” style tales, rather than “loveable (allegedly) man-child and evil hapless bureaucrats bumble through world-changing events”. I never find the latter as funny as I am supposed to. There’s quite enough incompetence in real life thank-you-very-much; I read for escapism. However, things do pick up as Ariel begins to realise the seriousness of the situation and starts doing stuff. Although how effectively remains a question.
Despite their uselessness, I did nevertheless like the aliens. They are alien in many ways, both physically and psychologically; in fact, some of the physical descriptions had me flashing back to Sector General tales. Their “Constellation” idea for group working is intriguing; the eventual explanation of its genesis adding an unexpected layer. I also liked the fact that Ariel is effortlessly at ease with these aliens, unlike many of his earth-side relationships.
But all in all, I felt there was more interesting stuff going on behind the scenes than in main view. What was up with the Martian sub-plot? What were all the other aliens doing (we only see a handful)? What does the rest of the galaxy look like (these aliens are atypical)? Just what was the code Ariel wrote to reconfigure the habitat? Is the posed solution to uploading workable? And so on.
For the record, this is my one thousandth blog post!
Friday, 16 September 2016
going up!
Labels:
graphics,
politics,
statistics,
weather
Another brilliant, and terrifying, xkcd comic. You know what’s coming, and it’s still a shock.
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Earth temperature timeline
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Thursday, 15 September 2016
bird of the desert
Labels:
birds
It almost looks fake, because of the background (sand), and the amazing shape of the wings. What a splendid shot!
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Swooping pharaoh eagle-owl hunts in the desert
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Wednesday, 14 September 2016
Bristol evening
I’m in Bristol for a couple of meetings. I had a fascinating chat about soft robots and reservoir computing this afternoon with some Bristol robotics researchers. Tomorrow is a bit more admin-oriented. But for now, here’s the traditional view from a hotel window, here dominated by a magnificent tree:
I took a short walk down on the waterfront, watching the setting sun:
Around the corner, there was St Mary Redcliffe Church spire:
And so to dinner.
I wonder if they built the hotel around the tree? |
beautiful clouds and water reflections |
I love the quality of autumnal light |
Tuesday, 13 September 2016
Monday, 12 September 2016
what's novelty?
Labels:
complexity,
evolution,
publishing,
research,
simulation,
systems
Our paper “Defining and simulating open-ended novelty: requirements, guidelines, and challenges” has just been published in Theory in Biosciences.
A full-text view-only version of the paper is available from the publisher.
abstract:
The open-endedness of a system is often defined as a continual production of novelty. Here we pin down this concept more fully by defining several types of novelty that a system may exhibit, classified as variation, innovation, and emergence. We then provide a meta-model for including levels of structure in a system’s model. From there, we define an architecture suitable for building simulations of open-ended novelty-generating systems and discuss how previously proposed systems fit into this framework. We discuss the design principles applicable to those systems and close with some challenges for the community.
A full-text view-only version of the paper is available from the publisher.
Sunday, 11 September 2016
reversible computing
Labels:
garden
We have a new logic gate in our garden.
Here it is from the other side, highlighting the armillary sphere we got a few years back.
Here it is from the other side, highlighting the armillary sphere we got a few years back.
Thursday, 8 September 2016
check mate
British Airways passengers delayed by computer glitch
Customers were encouraged to check in online before they reach the airport.I’m sure they were. So why does British Airways not allow online checkin until 24 hours before your flight? And that is for individual flights, so you can’t even check in your return flight before you leave!
Get with the 21st century, BA.
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Tuesday, 6 September 2016
cognitive biases
Labels:
cognition,
psychology
A nice categorisation and summary of cognitive biases.
[via Danny Yee's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Cognitive bias cheat sheet
[via Danny Yee's blog]
For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page
Sunday, 4 September 2016
Saturday, 3 September 2016
an easier target in Fahrenheit?
Labels:
weather
Seriously, BBC, WTF?
There is a difference between temperature and temperature difference!
I blogged about suchnonsense a few years back, and even noted that I had once seen a similar statement in a newspaper. I didn’t have a source. I do now!
The BBC page has now been fixed to say just “rise in temperatures below 2C”; but why not “rise in temperatures below 2C (3.6F)”, or even “rise in temperatures below 2°C (3.6°F)”?
[BBC News item seen on my phone this morning] |
There is a difference between temperature and temperature difference!
I blogged about suchnonsense a few years back, and even noted that I had once seen a similar statement in a newspaper. I didn’t have a source. I do now!
The BBC page has now been fixed to say just “rise in temperatures below 2C”; but why not “rise in temperatures below 2C (3.6F)”, or even “rise in temperatures below 2°C (3.6°F)”?
Friday, 2 September 2016
a new garden gate
Labels:
garden
A new piece of our garden is being erected:
Technically, such a feature is called a “moon gate” (although even more technically, there should then probably be a wall for it to be a gate through).
Calling ours the Moon Gate could fit with the various astronomical themes in the garden, but we thought a bit more. We have a similar sized metal circle in the Time Garden on the other side of the house: that Time Gate allows you to pass from the present to the future. The pond-with-spaceship area forms the Space Garden, so maybe this should be the Space Gate, allowing you to pass from here to there?
But on this side of the gate is a knot garden (to be in keeping with the Tudorbethan house), which has been partially destroyed by the visiting spaceship. This area is therefore known as the Logic Garden.
And so the new gate has been dubbed … the Logic Gate, allowing you to pass from CNOT to NAND.
(the large beach balls in the pond are a temporary anti-duck measure, to allow the water lilies to grow unnibbled) |
Technically, such a feature is called a “moon gate” (although even more technically, there should then probably be a wall for it to be a gate through).
Calling ours the Moon Gate could fit with the various astronomical themes in the garden, but we thought a bit more. We have a similar sized metal circle in the Time Garden on the other side of the house: that Time Gate allows you to pass from the present to the future. The pond-with-spaceship area forms the Space Garden, so maybe this should be the Space Gate, allowing you to pass from here to there?
But on this side of the gate is a knot garden (to be in keeping with the Tudorbethan house), which has been partially destroyed by the visiting spaceship. This area is therefore known as the Logic Garden.
And so the new gate has been dubbed … the Logic Gate, allowing you to pass from CNOT to NAND.
Thursday, 1 September 2016
open letter sent to my MP
Labels:
politics
Dear Lucy Frazer MP
On Monday 5 September, Parliament will debate the petition signed by over 4 million people on the EU referendum.
This may be the only opportunity Parliament will get to debate the UK’s EU membership status. The Prime Minister has reportedly said there will be no Parliamentary vote prior to triggering Article 50. [1]
If there is to be no Parliamentary vote, that would be an astounding denial of Parliament’s rights, responsibilities, and sovereignty.
There needs to be debate. The EU referendum result is not legally binding; it is purely advisory. Parliament must be given the opportunity to consider the result as advice, along with any other relevant information, particularly any not available to the electorate at the time.
The Electoral Reform Society has issued a scathing report[2] on the conduct of the process leading up to the EU Referendum, in stark contrast to that leading up to the Scottish Independence Referendum. This casts the legitimacy of the result into considerable doubt. Campaigners demonstrably lied, and so the outcome cannot necessarily be construed as the will of an “informed electorate”.
In your 2015 General Election leaflet you said that you were “Securing Britain’s future”. The greatest constitutional change to affect the UK in over a generation should not be made hastily, and certainly not without Parliament’s informed debate and consideration. Please do not miss the opportunity on Monday 5 September to start such debate, and to ensure its continuance, in order to secure the UK’s future.
Yours sincerely
On Monday 5 September, Parliament will debate the petition signed by over 4 million people on the EU referendum.
This may be the only opportunity Parliament will get to debate the UK’s EU membership status. The Prime Minister has reportedly said there will be no Parliamentary vote prior to triggering Article 50. [1]
If there is to be no Parliamentary vote, that would be an astounding denial of Parliament’s rights, responsibilities, and sovereignty.
There needs to be debate. The EU referendum result is not legally binding; it is purely advisory. Parliament must be given the opportunity to consider the result as advice, along with any other relevant information, particularly any not available to the electorate at the time.
The Electoral Reform Society has issued a scathing report[2] on the conduct of the process leading up to the EU Referendum, in stark contrast to that leading up to the Scottish Independence Referendum. This casts the legitimacy of the result into considerable doubt. Campaigners demonstrably lied, and so the outcome cannot necessarily be construed as the will of an “informed electorate”.
In your 2015 General Election leaflet you said that you were “Securing Britain’s future”. The greatest constitutional change to affect the UK in over a generation should not be made hastily, and certainly not without Parliament’s informed debate and consideration. Please do not miss the opportunity on Monday 5 September to start such debate, and to ensure its continuance, in order to secure the UK’s future.
Yours sincerely
...
[1] although that may not be legally possible, since the European Communities Act 1972 must first be repealed
[2] Electoral Reform Society. It’s Good to Talk: Doing referendums differently after the EU vote. Sept 2016.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)