## Wednesday, 31 December 2014

### selection with and without replacement

 Selection without replacement
Often, we want to selects K items at random from a pool of N items, without replacement.  That means we select the first item at random, remove it from the pool, put it aside, then take out the second from the remaining N–1 items, and so on.  This is different from selection with replacement, where we do not remove the selected items from the pool, so we are always selecting from N items, and may select the same item more than once.

An example of selection with replacement is forming a random string by selecting from a bag containing several balls, each marked with a unique character of the relevant alphabet.  The first character in the string is that on the first ball drawn.  The ball is replaced, the bag shaken, and a second ball drawn to produce the second character, and so on.  Clearly the same ball may be drawn more than once in this process, so characters can repeat.  If instead we drew without replacement, we would instead get a string where each character appeared at most once (since each ball in the bag has a unique character), and the string length would be limited by the number of balls in the bag.

In Python, we cam implement choice with replacement readily, using the random module.
# choose K from N, with replacement
import random

K = 6
N = 16
bag = range(0,N-1)

draw = []
for i in range(0,K):
draw += [random.choice(bag)]

print draw

Running this gives results like
[6, 2, 6, 1, 5, 5]

and
[1, 0, 0, 4, 9, 9]

In fact, choosing several items without replacement is so common, the numpy module extends choice() to take an extra argument
# choose K from N, with replacement
import numpy

K = 6
N = 16
bag = range(0,N-1)

draw = numpy.random.choice(bag,K)
print draw

Running this gives results like
array([12,  1, 11,  4, 10, 10])


How to choose without replacement?

We could keep choosing with replacement, checking that we have no duplicates, until we have enough unique choices.  But this is very inefficient, particularly when K is close to N, as finding that last unique choice is unlikely! It also doesn’t extend to the case where there are duplicate items in the bag, as it is not possible to tell whether a drawn item has been drawn before, or is merely the same as one that has been drawn before.

We could explicitly remove the item from the bag each time. In Python, we can implement choice with replacement, choosing at random as before, but now explicitly removing the item from the bag, too.
# choose K from N, without replacement
import random

K = 6
N = 16
bag = range(0,N-1)

draw = []
for i in range(0,6):
item = random.choice(bag)
draw += [item]
bag.remove(item)

print draw, bag
Running this gives results like
[3, 13, 7, 9, 11, 2] [0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14]

and
[4, 3, 5, 14, 11, 9] [0, 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13]

There are no duplicates in the list, and the chosen items are removed from the bag.

Iterations usually feel non-Pythonic, unless over something necessarily temporal.  Here the iterative solution arises from the temporal nature of the description: draw a ball, then another, then another.  But is there another way: can I just draw all K items all together in a single handful? Can we remove the iteration?

To draw a handful, it seems I need to make several random choices from my neatly ordered list in the bag.  But actually, the point of a bag is that all the items are jumbled up.  This is the clue: jumble up the list, then take a handful from that jumble.

So, we can randomly permute (jumble) the items in the bag, and then take the first K elements (handful) of that permutation:
# choose K from N, without replacement
import numpy

K = 6
N = 16
bag = range(0,N-1)

draw = numpy.random.permutation(bag)[0:K].tolist()
print draw


This gives us what we want. (The tolist() is there to convert the numpy result from an array back to a list, and is needed only if you want a list rather than an array).  Different runs give different permutations, and hence different handfuls (initial slices).  I used this technique to choose the K random input nodes to each of the N nodes in my random boolean network example (although it is hidden deep in the calculation of Con).

The bag doesn’t have to be a simple list of numbers: it can be a list of anything we want to choose from.  Let’s say we have an N×N grid, and want to choose K distinct positions, that is, K coordinates without replacement. We can create a bag of coordinates (here using a list comprehension), permute them, and slice the front off, thus:
# choose K from N, without replacement
import numpy

K = 6
N = 4
bag = [ [i,j] for i in range(0,N)  for j in range(0,N) ]
print bag

draw = numpy.random.permutation(bag)[0:K].tolist()
print draw

Running this gives results like
[[0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 0], [1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 0], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [3, 0], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3]]
[[0, 3], [1, 3], [3, 2], [2, 3], [3, 3], [3, 1]]

and there are our random positions!  That feels more Pythonic to me.

## Tuesday, 30 December 2014

### Kindling thoughts

Jo Walton has got an e-book reader.

That means I should think about it again, since her previous review was one of the things that put me off last time I was considering it.﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

### bonnet frost (or, frost on the hood)

We haven't used the car for about three days, and remarkably beautiful long fronds of frost have slowly grown on it.  It seemed a pity to disturb it this morning.  But we needed to shop.

## Monday, 29 December 2014

### paint the sky with stars

Sunset tonight caught a con trail crossing some clouds, painting the sky with a huge asterisk.

 sunset, 16:19 GMT

### comprehending comprehensions

One of the features of Python I really like, and am using more and more, is its list comprehension.  This allows the items in a list to be manipulated as a whole, rather than having to explicitly iterate over them.

The basic form of a list comprehension is
[ expr for item in list ]

where expr is an expression in the variable item.

For example, let’s say I have heard that the term x3x, where x is an integer, is always divisible by 3.  Before trying to prove (or disprove!) this, I want to have a quick look at a few examples to check there isn’t a really simple counter-example.  I can write:
>>> [ x * x * x - x for x in range(-4,10) ]
[-60, -24, -6, 0, 0, 0, 6, 24, 60, 120, 210, 336, 504, 720]
Well, that looks plausible, but maybe my mental arithmetic isn’t too hot, and I need confirmation that all those numbers really are divisible by 3.

A list comprehension has an optional condition, returning only the (expression of) the items where the condition is true.
[ expr for item in list if cond ]
A few of the integers not divisible by 3 are:
>>> [ x for x in range(-4,10) if x%3 != 0 ]
[-4, -2, -1, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8]
Are any of the cubic expressions not divisible by 3?
>>> [ x for x in range(-4,10) if (x * x * x - x)%3 != 0 ]
[]
Okay, so it’s probably worth having a shot at the proof then.

Of course, comprehensions aren’t limited to lists of numbers.  Let’s say I have a list of strings, and want to get a list of the lengths of the long strings (more than 5 characters long, say).
>>> animals = [ 'cat', 'dog', 'horse', 'elephant', 'meerkat', 'ox']
>>> [ len(s) for s in animals ]
[3, 3, 5, 8, 7, 2]
>>> [ s for s in animals if 5 < len(s) ]
['elephant', 'meerkat']
>>> [ len(s) for s in animals if 5 < len(s) ]
[8, 7]


List comprehensions can be applied to nested lists, too. I might have a list of lists, let’s say a list of a list of animal and of planets (why not?).
>>> planets = [ 'Mercury', 'Venus', 'Earth', 'Mars', 'Jupiter', 'Saturn', 'Uranus', 'Neptune', 'Pluto']
>>> big_list = [ animals, planets ]
>>> big_list
[['cat', 'dog', 'horse', 'elephant', 'ox'], ['Mercury', 'Venus', 'Earth', 'Mars', 'Jupiter', 'Saturn', 'Uranus', 'Neptune', 'Pluto']]
(I’m sorry, but as far as I’m concerned, Pluto is indeed a planet.)

I can get a list of the lengths of all the long strings:
>>>[ s for lst in big_list for s in lst ]
['cat', 'dog', 'horse', 'elephant', 'meerkat', 'ox', 'Mercury', 'Venus', 'Earth', 'Mars', 'Jupiter', 'Saturn', 'Uranus', 'Neptune', 'Pluto']
>>>[ len(s) for lst in big_list for s in lst ]
[3, 3, 5, 8, 7, 2, 7, 5, 5, 4, 7, 6, 6, 7, 5]
>>>[ len(s) for lst in big_list for s in lst if 5 < len(s) ]
[8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 6, 7]
This way, I can process the nested lists as one big flattened list.

But what if I didn’t want to flatten the list?  Well, since list comprehensions are themselves expressions, they can form the expression in a list comprehension!  Used this way, they maintain the structure of the original nesting.  So
>>>[ [s for s in lst] for lst in big_list ]
[['cat', 'dog', 'horse', 'elephant', 'meerkat', 'ox'], ['Mercury', 'Venus', 'Earth', 'Mars', 'Jupiter', 'Saturn', 'Uranus', 'Neptune', 'Pluto']]
>>>[ [len(s) for s in lst] for lst in big_list ]
[[3, 3, 5, 8, 7, 2], [7, 5, 5, 4, 7, 6, 6, 7, 5]]
>>>[ [len(s) for s in lst if 5 < len(s)] for lst in big_list ]
[[8, 7], [7, 7, 6, 6, 7]]
This approach becomes even more powerful when the list items are objects, and we need to operate on object attribute values.  Let’s assume that the list items above are not strings, but objects with a name attribute that is the relevant string.
>>>[ [s.name for s in lst if 5 < len(s.name)] for lst in big_list ]
[['elephant', 'meerkat'], ['Mercury', 'Jupiter', 'Saturn', 'Uranus', 'Neptune']]
When using a list comprehension as an expression inside another comprehension in this way, we don’t need to have it as the top level expression.  Let’s assume that we want a list of numpy arrays of the lengths (maybe because we want to do numpy operations on the resulting lists, such as averaging the results).
>>> from numpy import *
>>>[ array([len(s.name) for s in lst if 5 < len(s.name)]) for lst in big_list ]
[array([8, 7]), array([7, 7, 6, 6, 7])]

List comprehensions are powerful, removing the need for explicit for loops that iterate over the list items.  This results in more compact, and efficient, code, and encourages thinking of lists as a whole.  Take care that the compact code remains comprehensible, however, especially with nested comprehensions.

And there are dictionary comprehensions, too.

## Thursday, 25 December 2014

### sequestering carbon, one Christmas at a time

Here’s what Santa brought us:

## Wednesday, 24 December 2014

### film review: The Imitation Game

Alan Turing did seminal work in several fields – on the fundamental theory of computing, Artificial Intelligence (the Imitation Game of the title), biological morphogenesis – and contributed to several others – neural networks, the Reimann zeta function, the quantum Zeno effect, and more. One area I’m not aware of him having contributed to (although I may well be wrong!) is the Many Worlds interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Which is a pity, as this movie is clearly set in an alternate reality.

In this alternate (or merely fictional) universe, Alan Turing [Benedict Cumberbatch] is a semi-autistic anti-social loner, who single-handedly, against the opposition of his co-workers, builds a giant computer that breaks the German Enigma code, so winning WWII, and then goes mad in Manchester, building another computer in his front room to recreate his schoolboy crush, Christopher.

Don’t get me wrong: this alternate universe story is well told, and is the basis of my “worth watching” rating. I very much enjoyed it, with its interleaved flashbacks between his schooldays, the WWII code-breaking, the Manchester incident, the complex relationships between the characters, and the celebration of intellectual prowess and of difference generally. But I enjoyed it only as an alternate world story. Don’t rely on anything here as historically accurate (the movie’s disclaimer basically says as much); there was a person called Alan Turing, he was gay, and he was involved in breaking the Enigma code during WWII, but that’s probably it. (Oh, and Euler is pronounced Oi-ler, not You-ler.) If you want a better shot at the reality, read the book this film is “based” on: Hodges’ The Enigma of Intelligence

For all my film reviews, see my main website.

### Everything is Awesome

Emmett is a completely contented minifig, working on a massive construction project with his buddies, singing the company song, having a great life. But this all changes when he sees a strange woman searching the construction site. He follows her, falls down a hole, and gets attached to the Piece of Resistance. It seems he is the prophesied Special One, destined to save the world from the evil Lord Business. Mayhem ensues.

This is great fun, much more than just a movie-length toy advert (although it is that, too). It is full of verbal and visual wit, with clever little references all over the place, and even better if you know your Lego. It inevitably gets a bit saccharine at the end, with the “message” of not being inflexible. But since that message is rather confused (it is the Master Builders who can build “off piste” who are supposedly the heroes, yet Emmett and crew win the day by following the instructions to build a particular device the same as all the others), it can be safely ignored.

It has been noted that there are rather few female characters (there’s the co-protagonist Wyldstyle/Lucy, Wonder Woman, a female construction worker, and some background characters), reflecting LEGO’s disappointing number of female minifigs overall, and it fails the Bechdel test. Wyldstyle is actually a reasonably strong figure, and it could be argued that it is she who “gets the guy” rather than the other way round. What I actually found most teeth-grinding was the ending, where the boy is “threatened” with having to play with his little sister, clearly a dreadful fate.

Despite these grumbles, overall this is a fun piece and wonderfully visualised of mind-candy, and I laughed out loud many times at the various visual jokes.

Everything is Awesome, Everything is cool when you’re part of a team

For all my film reviews, see my main website.

## Tuesday, 23 December 2014

### Joseph, Warrior of the 37th Century

Scalzi had me at the “demon worshippers vs Future Ninjas subplot”…

What if the angel is secretly a fallen angel, and the shepherds aren’t really shepherds at all, but a secret order of demon worshippers disguised as shepherds, who have been waiting for centuries, at the ready, to kidnap the savior foretold by prophecy at the moment of his birth, and the fallen angel is telling them so they can put their dark plan into action? Now, that makes sense!

That’s a nativity film I’d watch!

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

### merely resting

This is a dead parrot ... not.

The [Scottish SPCA] was called to the scene on Great Western Road in Aberdeen after what a driver believed to be a parrot was seen in the middle of the road.
However, when they got there they discovered it was a woolly hat.

 duck ... rabbit ... parrot ... hat

Better to check, and be mistaken, than not to check at all.

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

### a picture window to dream of

WANT

Any of the murals, that is, not necessarily the furniture!

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Monday, 22 December 2014

### pet food by post

I was trawling through the latest recommendations Amazon have for me, when I came across

The perils of low sample sizes, I thought: someone bought Grimm 3 and dog food in one order, so now Amazon thinks I want dog food.

A little later I saw

Oh, I thought, they bought bird food, too.

But wait!  This wasn't the Grimm-loving dog-owner, this was instead a Feist-loving bird watcher.

I’ve had some strange recommendations before, but this was just weird.

## Sunday, 21 December 2014

### solstice sunset

It’s just another solstice Sunday.

 sunset, 16:03 GMT

### sequestering carbon, several books at a time XXXVII

The latest batch:

Several other brown cardboard boxes have been arriving in the post, and shuffled off to various secret hiding places.  I expect them to reappear later in the week...

## Tuesday, 16 December 2014

### deleting birthdays

I just saw a birthday notification in my Google Calendar, about someone in my Google+ circles.  Getting rid of these annoying unasked-for entries requires a few clicks, as detailed below.

Thank you, Awesomely Techie!﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Monday, 15 December 2014

### Strandbeest

I’ve seen pictures of Strandbeest before, but I didn’t realise they were huge, or that there are so many designs.﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Sunday, 14 December 2014

### cycling to freedom

Here is a nice YouTube description of the “100 prisoners problem”, that seems on the face of it impossible, but where a clever mathematical result makes it feasible.

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Wednesday, 10 December 2014

### language evolution

Queen photobombs selfie.

Three words that capture the moment – two of which didn’t even exist a few years ago!

 Glasgow 2014: Queen ‘photo-bombs’ hockey players’ selfie

Also, I just used the words “queen” and “(photo)bomb” in an online search to find the article…﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Sunday, 7 December 2014

### flickering aurorae

When I was younger, I thought aurorae were static, only having seen pictures in books. Then I discovered they moved. But these REAL TIME shots are awesome. Watch full screen!

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Sunday, 30 November 2014

### SF book review: The Martian

Andy Weir.
The Martian.
Del Rey. 2014

The third Mars mission has had to evacuate and return home because of a dangerously strong storm. Due to a freak accident, Mark Watney is left for dead. But he’s not dead. And now he’s alone on Mars, without enough food, air, or energy to last the many months it would take rescue to arrive. Not that he can call for help. Nevertheless, he is an engineer…

This is a great adventure of engineer versus planet, in the old tradition: Apollo 13 meets Gravity meets A Fall of Moondust.

Watney is competent and resourceful, and he does have resources to be resourceful with: all the equipment the crew left behind when they abandoned Mars. Mars keeps throwing problems at him, and he keeps figuring out solutions, knowing that the first problem he can't solve will kill him for sure.

What makes this fun is all the engineering (although I’m sure it’s much harder than shown here); the little acid comments Watney keeps making about the entertainment choices of his departed crewmates; and the potatoes.

I am surprised that Watney didn’t realise that Earth would be able to see that he was still alive, but much of the rest of it rings sufficiently true to make this a thrilling adventure across the Red Planet.

For all my book reviews, see my main website.

### book review: Quiet

Susan Cain.
Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking.
Penguin. 2012

Most of the Western world, and certainly the USA, is organised not only expecting but requiring everyone to be an extrovert. This is very tough on the large minority of the population who are actually introverts. Why are scientists and other thinkers required to go out and “sell” themselves and their ideas, whereas salespeople are not similarly required to reflect and ponder? Rather than advocating some form of “cure” for this minority, Susan Cain (a self-acknowledged introvert) sets out how these quiet ones can provide a positive benefit (because actually thinking about things is beneficial!) and how they can better organise parts of their work and social life to cope with being surrounded by their extrovert peers.

There’s lots of good stuff here, from the history of how the world became extrovert-focussed and so dismissive of introverts, the myth of leaders needing to be extroverts, how to nurture introvert (and extrovert) children, how introversion and shyness are not the same thing, why introverts make better long term investors, and much more.

If you prefer to recharge your mental batteries alone rather than at a party, or have a partner, friend or colleague who does, you should read this book.

For all my book reviews, see my main website.

## Saturday, 29 November 2014

### sequestering carbon, several books at a time XXXVI

This batch we got the hard way: walking in to shops, picking books off the shelves, and physically carrying them home.

After visiting the Lego BRICK event at the ExCel, we popped into central London, first to Foyles, then to Forbidden Planet.  The Lego event explains some of the purchases...

Foyles has moved a few yards down Charing Cross Road from when I was there last.  The shop that is now in its old location has made excellent reuse of its name:

The new Foyles is rather different in style from the way it used to be.  To be fair, it had been changing even in its previous location.  But I well remember the eccentric shelving by publisher, and the three separate queues (to get the books wrapped and stored, then to pay, and then to collect the paid-for books).  Now there is only one queue, and the shelving is less idiosyncratic.  However, I did fail to find the books on Python and Processing in the Programming Languages section: the Python books were mainly under Web (and the Nutshell volumes under O'Reilly, the publisher!), and the Processing books were with Graphics.  But that’s more a problem of having to have a single physical hierarchy.

Books are heavy.

## Friday, 28 November 2014

### bricks galore

Today was a holiday in London, at the Lego BRICK 2014 festival, in the ExCel.  (That’s the same huge building as the SF WorldCon this summer, but in a different huge hall.)

There were some tremendous pieces, like Westminster Abbey.

 Westminster Abbey
There was a good display of the latest generation of Lego Mindstorms, EV3, including a robot scorpion

 beware!
and the Cubestormer, the record-breaking Rubik’s cube solver:

Not everything was a massive construction.  Some smaller pieces helped demonstrate the versitility.

 the Platonic solids
Small bricks are just large pixels, so there were many pictures on display.  My favourite was this transition of millennia:

 Lego Lascaux, complete with Lego prehistoric artists
 the original, for comparison

It’s easier to do things like this with the large palette of colours available today.

 a far cry from the old black, white, red, blue, yellow and green...
Trains were much in evidence, combining two standard passions.  Possibly my favourite was the nested train systems:

 nested train systems
The upper small oval track system was itself mounted on two trains, one running on the lower large oval track, the other on the central narrow blue oval.  That itself was fun and clever, but then we spotted that lower train had a wagon hosting a tiny train running on its own little track, too!

It wasn’t just the Lego itself that was a blast from the past.

 Thunderbirds Are Go!
It all started getting a bit self-referential with the merchandising, though:

 the videogame based on the movie based on the toy
 full circle: the toy based on the movie based on the toy

We had a great time looking at all the displays, and also bought about £10 worth of bits (given the price of the entrance tickets, and the train fares, it was quite an expensive £10 purchase). Being a Friday, it wasn’t too crowded; I expect the Saturday will be packed.

Also, I can highly recommend the ExCel’s Orange and Chocolate muffins: they are delicious, and go brilliantly with the coffee.

## Thursday, 27 November 2014

I posted the following query to the Evernote Life community on Google+

The resulting note is horrible, because the field where I can add my own notes isn’t a fully functional space – eg, I can’t paste a link to the note of the meeting where I met the person (except as a full URL, not as an “internal” green link); I can’t paste a photo of the person; I can’t even change the font/colour of the text!

So I copied the note contents into a new “ordinary” note, then made all these edits.

(No, I’m not connected to LinkedIn; I’m not a member, and don’t intend to change that.)﻿

I got several helpful suggestions, plus confirmation that I was not missing something: for some reason, this restriction is the designed behaviour!

The suggestion I have adopted is to use the merge function to merge the business card note with another note containing the extra information I want (or, as I discovered, just with a blank new note).  The result is a fully editable note, but with the business card information left in its formatted state.

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

The latest batch

## Monday, 24 November 2014

### first frost

brr!

 car bonnet, closeup, 9:30am

## Saturday, 22 November 2014

### on not reinventing the wheel

Standards for Scientific Graphic Presentation is a lovely article by Jure Triglav on rediscovering best practice standards (from a document from 1914!) for displaying scientific figures.

(via writeLaTeX)

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Wednesday, 19 November 2014

I was at a two day workshop on Design: Shape & Structure in Leeds this week.  Part of the event involved technical conversations in small groups as we walked around the Yorkshire Sculpture Park.

Some of the sculpture I liked very much:

 Ursula von Rydingsvard
Some was fun:

Some I thought was a bit pretentious:

 Richard Long, Red Slate Line, 1986 (part of “walking as art”)

And a lot more I didn’t photograph.

At one point I was reminded of the amazing abilities of the human eye.  The two photographs below are of the exact same scene (as you can see from the shape of the treetops), one focused on the ground, one on the sky:

 14:30 GMT, and the sun is already that low…
The shot on the left has a greatly over-exposed sky; the one on the right has a very underexposed foreground.  Yet to my eye at the time, the foreground appeared as in the shot on the left, whilst the sky looked like the one on the right (in fact, it was the glorious sunbeams that made me take the shot).  I am sure I could have got a better photo with something a bit more sophisticated than my phone-camera, of course.

As we were leaving, I spotted this very square tree, looking almost like a sculpture itself:

 what growth rules result in this shape?
As a way of getting to know the research interests of the other members of the workshop, of getting fresh air, and of getting muddy shoes, I can highly recommend this walk-and-talk approach.

## Monday, 17 November 2014

### sunrise

The view walking down from the car park this morning: tree in sunbeam.

 8:02 GMT, Heslington East Campus, York

## Sunday, 16 November 2014

### Season review: I kissed the Master, and I liked it

We are back to the days when the Doctor was a grownup, not one of the lads. Peter Capaldi is an older, grimmer, angrier Doctor, and a better actor, adding depth to the character, and pulling better performances from Jenna Coleman (Clara), too.

There were a few clunkers of episodes this season, and it was a pity it started with one. Despite the ever-welcome presence of Vastra, Jenny, and Strax (when are they getting their own series?), Deep Breath was just trying too hard. And the less said about Kill the Moon, the better.

The little arc teasers running through the season culminated in a two part finale, with its grandiose, but rather sick, premise. Since I found Danny Pink rather uncharismatic, I couldn’t get that upset by his part in the finale, only with its shattering conclusion (see what happens when you aren’t honest with each other?).

Then the finale lost its nerve, with that little advert for the Christmas special.

For all my SF TV reviews, see my main website.

## Friday, 14 November 2014

### only time will tell

I like this clever tautology, to potentially infinite regress…

 it’s right angle o’clock

(via Hiroki Sayama via Tim Hutton)

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Wednesday, 12 November 2014

### Seriously ESA, WTF?

I’m really excited by Rosetta and the Philae landing on comet 67P/Churyumox-Gerasimenko today.

 Philae landed on this!
Except...

 No no women are toooootally welcome in our community, just ask the dude in this shirt. https://t.co/r88QRzsqAm pic.twitter.com/XmhHKrNaq5 — Rose Eveleth (@roseveleth) November 12, 2014

Seriously ESA, WTF?

The Business Insider article puts it clearly:
Taylor recently participated in a live online chat with the Wall Street Journal in which he was asked how he gained acceptance in such a respected field while sporting sleeve-length tattoos.
He responded, "The people I work with don't judge me by my looks but only by the work I have done and can do. Simple."
If only women could hope to someday be judged that way too. ﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

### bangers and mashup

Makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand on end.

(via BoingBoing)﻿

For all my social networking posts, see my Google+ page

## Monday, 10 November 2014

### sequestering carbon, several books at a time XXXIV

The latest batch:

The Home Plumbing Manual is in response to a leak that has now been fixed, but we hope to be better prepared next time.

I have already blogged on the Beta Life book launch.

Cobra Guardian arrived a while ago in a rather sorry state; it has since been sitting under a heavy weight to become a little less bent, but still has an interesting curve to its cover.